. - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . -
|
The Corruption
|
Sometimes I feel at a loss for words: for example, when I see something which is manifestly very evil or very dangerous or very foolish being done by the American government -- something which is done in plain sight where everyone else can see it just as well as I can -- and nearly everyone else acts as if everything is normal, that there's nothing to worry about. It's like a house is on fire on a busy street, burning brightly in the middle of the day, and hundreds of people are walking by, paying no attention at all to the fire, and I begin yelling, "Fire! Fire! Look, there's a fire!" People would look at me as if I were a fool. And most of the American public goes on about its business as if nothing is happening. They continue watching their ball games on TV and shopping in the malls, while the government they elected murders their kinsmen in Europe. It doesn't really bother them. Now, perhaps they don't understand that the people around Clinton who are waging this undeclared war are evil. Perhaps that's too deep a moral issue for them to get into. Perhaps they don't even know that the Clinton gang are all Jews. Perhaps they've been too busy watching their ball games to notice that. But we have to assume that a substantial portion of them are bright enough to understand that the government's whole rationale for this war is a pack of lies; it's nonsense. Slobodan Milosevic is called a "fascist dictator." Actually, Milosevic is a socialist. He used to be a communist. And he is the democratically elected president of Yugoslavia. He is accused of "aggression" for putting down an Albanian rebel army of terrorists and guerrillas in Serbia's Kosovo province. If a Mexican rebel army tried to take Texas or Arizona or California away from the United States, and the U.S. government sent in the Army to put down the rebellion, should that be called "aggression"? I've said this before, but I'll say it again: the only aggression taking place in Yugoslavia now is the unprovoked bombing of that sovereign nation by an outside force, namely, the United States and its collaborators. What the United States is doing to Yugoslavia fits exactly what the word "aggression" means and always has meant, both in common usage and in international law. And the effort of the Yugoslav government to put down a revolt by Albanian rebels is not aggression. Now, maybe the couch potatoes can't figure that out, but there are hundreds of thousands of Americans who can, and that includes every politician in Washington and every media boss, and it also includes thousands of business leaders, academic leaders, and cultural leaders. Why are they not speaking out against the aggression against Yugoslavia? Why aren't they displaying their outrage, their horror, their disagreement with what the Clinton government is doing? Why aren't the politicians in the Congress speaking out? They impeached Clinton for his perjury, but what he is doing now against Yugoslavia is a thousand times more criminal, and they do nothing. You know, this is not a question of whether you sympathize more with Albanians or with Serbs. This is not a question of whether you believe that Kosovo should remain a part of Serbia or should become a part of Albania instead. This is a matter of your government in Washington being out of control and doing atrocious and illegal things that neither the Constitution of the United States nor the historically expressed will of the American people gives it the right to do. The Clinton gang is murdering people wholesale, destroying European cultural treasures, giving patently spurious excuses for what it is doing, and the politicians and the media bosses have expressed their virtually unanimous approval, while most of the American people -- including those bright enough and knowledgeable enough to understand clearly what's happening -- remain silent or even express their approval. So why should I make myself look foolish by shouting, "Fire!"? Well, the reason that I'm willing to risk looking foolish is that there are some people besides myself who do care: the people who are demonstrating with the Serbs in American cities, the people who are throwing bricks at American embassies around the world. And there are a lot of other people who are not blind supporters of whatever Clinton and his Jews do, people who at least are troubled by the murder being committed in their name by their government, people who would like to understand. I hope that by speaking out I can help some of them understand and take a position. And besides, even if no one else cared, even if no one wanted to understand, speaking out against evil is the right thing to do. It is what every moral man is obliged to do, regardless of whether or not it accomplishes anything. Let's go back and look again at some of the issues involved here. This business of labeling as "aggression" the internal policies of another country that our government doesn't like and then using that as an excuse to wage undeclared war against the other country really ought to be troubling to every patriotic American, regardless of his religion or his politics. The example I gave a minute ago of the Mexicans in Texas or California outnumbering the White people a few years hence and declaring that henceforth the state in question will be a part of Mexico -- or "Aztlan," as they call it -- is not really very farfetched. Mexican organizations in the United States already are making plans to do exactly that. Will we approve of the U.S. government putting down such an attempt to secede, or will we condemn any effort to preserve the Union as "aggression"? You know, it really is important to be consistent. It really is important for the people of a nation to feel that they are right and just in their actions. And how can we call the effort of the Yugoslav government to put down a rebellion by Albanians in Kosovo "aggression" without condemning our own government when it acts similarly in the future? The couch potatoes -- the people who voted for Clinton -- may not care about such things, but the rest of us should. One of the most hypocritical aspects of Clinton's war against Yugoslavia is the pretense that Belgrade is being bombed for "humanitarian" reasons, that Americans are killing Serbs to save the lives of Albanians. You know, what started the conflict in Kosovo a year ago between Albanian rebels and the Yugoslav government was the covert arming of the Albanians by the U.S. government. The KLA, or Kosovo Liberation Army, is really a "contra" army which was financed and supplied by the Clinton government. Perhaps the Serbs would eventually have ethnically cleansed Kosovo, or large parts of it, anyway, but what actually brought the conflict in Kosovo to a head last year was the buildup of the KLA. This KLA buildup to an armed force of 25,000 guerrillas and terrorists forced Milosevic to move against them. It was when the Serbs began beating the KLA -- and perhaps committing some atrocities at the same time -- that the Clinton gang began bombing. And since the bombing began, the Serbs greatly stepped up their efforts against the KLA -- an entirely reasonable response on the part of the Serbs -- and at the same time forced Albanians believed to be sympathetic to the KLA to become refugees. Now the Serbs have destroyed the KLA, and so the Clinton gang wants to send in U.S. troops to take the place of the KLA. Why did the Clinton government provoke trouble in Kosovo in the first place by arming the KLA? Could it have something to do with Kosovo's enormous mineral wealth? I don't know the full answer to that yet, but I do know that the lead, cadmium, zinc, gold, and silver mines in the northern part of Kosovo make it one of the most valuable pieces of real estate in the world. And I do know that there wouldn't have been any major conflict in Kosovo last year if it hadn't been for the arming and financing of the KLA. And there wouldn't be half a million or so cold and hungry Albanian refugees today if the Clinton gang hadn't started a war. So let's cut out the baloney about "humanitarian" bombing. The one aspect of Clinton's war against Yugoslavia that cannot be overemphasized is the Jewish aspect. I know that many people don't like to hear about that aspect. It frightens them. Even some Serbs don't want that aspect of the war mentioned. They believe that it is not helpful to bring "anti-Semitism" into the issue. That's like a team of medical researchers looking for a cure for syphilis and afraid to mention spirochetes because they don't want to seem prejudiced against that particular type of pathogen. The facts are simple. It's not just that all the members of Clinton's foreign policy and national defense team happen to be Jews. That's not a coincidence. As I told you on the air and in print, loudly and repeatedly, at the time this bunch took their posts, back in December 1996, they took over for the specific purpose of leading America into another war. And it's no coincidence that every major Jewish organization is in favor of this war. The Jews talk openly about this in their own publications. Half the reports coming from the Jewish Telegraphic Agency during the past three weeks have talked about the solid Jewish support for the war against Serbia. And that is why all of the Republican politicians have fallen in line with the Democrats in backing the war. It's not that they believe in "supporting our boys." The best way to "support our boys" is to bring them home now and don't send them out to fight a war unless it is to defend America. No, the politicians are behind the war because the Jews are, and the politicians are afraid to buck the Jews. When the Clintonistas began the bombing more than three weeks ago some of the Republicans in the Congress were saying, "Whoa! Wait a minute! What have the Serbs done to us? I don't think we ought to start a war with them." But as soon as they saw that all of the powerful Jewish organizations were for the war, the Republicans shut up in a hurry. And the Jews are behind the war because it does serve their interests: not our interests, not America's interests, but Jewish interests. The Jews are all behind a concept they call "the New World Order." They're in favor of a New World Order in which all power is vested in a shadowy super-government which everyone in the world must obey -- a super-government which supersedes all national sovereignties and all individual rights everywhere -- and which is controlled by . . . guess whom? |
| kredyt mieszkaniowy : polish translation | |